Sunday 30 December 2012

Metro Baltic Horizons


THE TIGERS WE HAVE FIGHTING FOR US ;
CLEAN AS SNOW ( ISH ).


RNS Number : 3491V
Metro Baltic Horizons PLC

Save as set out below, neither of the Directors:
(i) has any unspent convictions in relation to indictable offences; or
(ii) has been bankrupt or entered into an individual voluntary arrangement; or
(iii) was a director of any company at the time of or within 12 months preceding any receivership, compulsory liquidation, creditors' voluntary liquidation, administration, company voluntary arrangement or any composition or arrangement with that company's creditors generally or with any class of its creditors; or
(iv) has been a partner in a partnership at the time of or within 12 months preceding any compulsory liquidation, administration or partnership voluntary arrangement of such partnership; or
(v) has had his assets the subject of any receivership or has been a partner of a partnership at the time of or within 12 months preceding any assets thereof being the subject of a receivership; or
(vi) has been subject to any public criticism by any statutory or regulatory authority (including any recognised professional body) or has ever been disqualified by a court from acting as a director of a company or from acting in the management or conduct of the affairs of a company.
Fyntel Limted, a company of which Mr Reid was a director, was wound up by members' voluntary liquidation in 2006.


15 April 2011

The Board of Metro Baltic Horizons plc ('Metro' or the 'Company') is pleased to announce the appointment, effective today, of Tim Crowley as a non-executive director to the Company. The Directors welcome Mr Crowley to the Board and look forward to working with him both going forward.
 Sensan Investment Holdings No 1 Ltd above 11%
Trentor sells out to 0%
Can` t even form  a quorum properly.
More good news.
 RNS Number: 8184Q.
The Company announces that at the Annual General Meeting held on 25 October 2011, all proxy votes received nominated the Chairman of the meeting as their proxy. Consequently, as two members present in person or by proxy are required to make a quorum, the meeting not being quorate is now adjourned until 9 November 2011 at 9.30am. The adjourned meeting will now be held at 75 St Stephens Green, Dublin 2, Ireland and all proxies received will remain valid. The Articles of Association of the Company specify that at the adjourned meeting one member present in person or by proxy shall constitute a quorum.
Worldwide Opportunity Fund (Cayman) Ltd above 15% very rapidly.
New auditors (Grant Thornton)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THE OLD DIRECTORS HAVE THE FEMALE FIGUREHEAD ( Mart Habakuk and Mr James Kenny).

Eagleheads is pleased to announce a cash offer for MBH 
MBH Shareholders who accept the Offer will be entitled to receive 9 cents (7.1 pence) in cash for each MBH Share.
Eagleheads Investments OÜ
Margarita Novikova



A Shore capital disclaimer 



The Offer shall be made solely by Eagleheads and neither Shore Capital nor any of its affiliates are making the Offer.

To the extent permitted by applicable law and, in accordance with, and to the extent permitted by normal UK market practice, Eagleheads or its nominees or brokers (acting as agents) or their respective affiliates may from time to time make certain purchases of, or arrangements to purchase, MBH Shares, other than pursuant to the Offer, before or during the period in which the Offer remains open for acceptance. These purchases may occur either in the open market at prevailing prices or in private transactions at negotiated prices. Such purchases, or arrangements to purchase, will comply with all applicable UK rules, including the rules of the London Stock Exchange to the extent applicable. In addition, in accordance with, and to the extent permitted by normal UK market practice, Shore Capital and its affiliates may engage in purchasing activities consistent with their respective normal and usual practice and applicable law. Any information about such purchases will be available from any Regulatory Information Service, including the Regulatory News Service on the London Stock Exchange website,www.londonstockexchange.com.

Eagleheads has friends in the city ( An extra 5% ,of the capital )



CASH OFFER
by
Eagleheads Investments OÜ ("Eagleheads")
for
Metro Baltic Horizons plc ("MBH")

Receipt of irrevocable undertaking to accept the Offer in respect of 1,408,000 MBH Shares, representing 5.37 per cent. of the existing issued share capital of MBH

On 19 July 2012, Eagleheads announced a firm intention to make an offer for 100 per cent. of the issued share capital of MBH not already owned by Eagleheads. Eagleheads is interested in 4,149,525 MBH Shares, equivalent to 15.84 per cent.of the existing issued share capital of MBH and The Eagleheads Group is interested in 4,193,091 MBH Shares, equivalent to 16 per cent. of the existing issued share capital of MBH.
Eagleheads has now received an irrevocable undertaking from an MBH Shareholder ("Relevant Shareholder") to accept the Offer in respect of the 1,408,000 MBH Shares held by it, representing 5.37 per cent. of the existing issued share capital of MBH.  This holding represents the Relevant Shareholder's entire interest in the capital of MBH at the date of this announcement.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THE NEW BOARD FIGHTBACK BEGINS.

Metro Baltic Horizons plc
Response to the announcement of a
Cash Offer by Eagleheads Investments OU
For immediate release
20 July 2012

The board of Metro Baltic Horizons plc ("MBH" or the "Company") notes cash offer for the entire issued share capital of MBH (the "unsolicited Offer") by Eagleheads Investments OU ("Eagleheads").

Preliminary observations on the unsolicited Offer

Eagleheads has been formed by Metro Capital Management AS ("MCM"), affiliates of MCM and Ms Margarita Novikova.

MBH is close to filing claims in excess of €20 million against MCM and others.

The Board's preliminary view is that the unsolicited Offer is an effort to win control of the Company at an offer price value of €2.36 million for the purpose of stopping MBH pursuing legal claims against MCM (and others) and to acquire its principal asset at a significant undervalue.

MBH is at an advanced stage of preparation of legal proceedings against the Company's former directors and professional advisers, including MCM and its principal, Mart Habakuk, and TAS (formerly Metro Frontier Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of MCM) and its former principal, James Kenny.  The Board anticipates that such claims will be for an amount in excess of €20 million and will include serious allegations of mismanagement of the Company.

The Board believes that shareholders suffered a loss in the value of their shares due to the mis-management of the Company's assets by MCM when it was the Company's investment adviser between December 2006 and its dismissal in August 2011.  The Board fears that similar mismanagement might cause further losses if Eagleheads gains control of the Company.

The Board has set out its preliminary observations on the unsolicited Offer below:

1.         Valuation

-     The Company's NAV has fallen dramatically since the initial admission of the Company's shares to AIM as a result of the mismanagement of the Company (as stated in the trading updated dated 3 August 2011 and Chairman's statements to the Annual Reports for the years ended 31 December 2010 and 31 December 2011). The mismanagement included, inter alia, excessive leverage, misleading announcements, the purchase of properties from related parties, including MCM/or and parties related to it, and unauthorised profits to the manager.

-     The Company's NAV stated in the 2011 annual report of 12.50 Euro cents was arrived at on a conservative basis, after deducting various costs including (i) investment management fees claimed by MCM, which the Board does not intend to pay given MCM's breaches of duty as investment manager, and (ii) purported liabilities and costs that are contested by the Company and which are associated with the loan note transaction pursuant to security granted over the St Petersburg site in favour of a former wholly-owned subsidiary of MCM.

-     Valuations can be prepared on various bases.  The valuation of the St Petersburg site referred to in Eagleheads' announcement was prepared in connection with Russian court proceedings on a forced sale basis and is not directly comparable with the open market value that MBH will seek in the event of a sale of the property. The Board is currently reviewing its options in the market at the same time as disputing the validity of the loan facility allegedly secured on the property. This is anticipated to lead to a decision to place the property on the market, which was independently valued at 31 December 2011 at €6.2m.

-     The Board has prepared litigation based on a reasonable expectation of material recoveries.  The value of such litigation cannot be reflected in the accounts.

-  Accordingly, while the Board believes that the NAV is fully and accurately calculated in accordance with MBH's accounting policies, it does not reflect the full potential value of the Company.

2.         Delisting

In addition, the unsolicited Offer clearly states Eagleheads' intention to seek the cancellation of the Company's admission to AIM. The Board believes that the AIM quotation and related corporate governance and disclosure requirements provide a valuable set of protections for Shareholders which could be lost should MCM acquire control of the Company.

3.         Additional concerns

In addition, the Board has the following concerns with the content of the unsolicited Offer:

-     The Board believes that the unsolicited Offer is misleading in that it refers to a purported right on the part of MCM to convert outstanding investment management fees into ordinary shares in MBH. While an amended investment management agreement was entered into by TAS and the the previous board, the Board believes it was subject to shareholder consent and that such specific consent was not sought and therefore no such right exists. Furthermore this specific issue was the catalyst for the actions taken leading to the appointment of Messrs Reid and Murphy to the Board, in relation to what they believed to be an attempt in part by TAS and MCM to take control of the Company. The Board also notes that the Company does not intend to discharge these fees owing to breaches of the Investment Management and Investment Advisory agreements.

-     The unsolicited Offer contains insufficient information on the property investment background of Ms Novikova.  MCM's property investment track record in relation to the Company's assets is self-evident to MBH's shareholders.

- Certain of the entities disclosed in announcement of the unsolicited Offer as related parties to MCM are the same parties who subscribed for the disputed loan notes allegedly secured on the St Petersburg property. 

As stated above, the Board is considering its full response to the unsolicited Offer with Fairfax and  will make a further announcement in due course.  Shareholders are recommended to not take any immediate action in relation to the unsolicited Offer.
MBH Shares in issue
MBH confirms that it has 26,200,270 ordinary shares of €0.01 each in issue and admitted to trading on the AIM market of the London Stock Exchange with the ISIN: IM00B14GZ. 
Metro Baltic Horizons plc

Holdings in Company and Directors' share dealing

Metro Baltic Horizons PLC ("MBH" or "the Company") announces that it has today been informed of certain  dealings in its securities on 20 July 2012 and 23 July 2012.

S 208 notifications
To summarise, notifications received under s 208 (4) of the Isle of Man Companies Act 1985,  were as follows:
Purchase / (Disposal)
MBH Shares
Current Holding of
MBH Shares
Current % of MBH Shares in issue
IIU Nominees Limited
2,600,000
5,978,500
22.82%
Dolmen Securities Limited
528,642

817,644
3.12%
Worldwide Opportunity Fund plc
(4,253,642)
Nil
0%

Directors Dealings
In addition to the dealings shown above, a pension fund in which Mr Ronan Reid, Chairman of the Company, is interested, acquired  600,000 shares (2.29% of the MBH shares in issue) on 20 July 2012 at a price of €0.10 cents (£0.077899) per share. As a result, the total shares in the Company in which Mr Reid is interested is 601,285 shares representing 2.29% of the MBH Shares in issue.


RUSSIAN PROPERTY SAVED and CURRENTLY IN LIMBO

The Board of Metro Baltic Horizons PLC ("MBH") wishes to announce that proceedings, which might have led to the forced sale of its property in St Petersburg to satisfy a disputed loan and related security, have been stayed by the Russian court pending the resolution of a related case which is being bought against its former investment adviser by MBH in the Estonian courts. The Board of MBH is pleased with this positive development, but notes it is one step in a complex litigation process and does not represent a definitive resolution to the matters that are the subject of said litigation


THE CURRENT BOARD .MUST BE MORE CAREFUL WITH LANGUAGE

The following amendments has been made to the 'Litigation update' announcement released on 26 July 2012 at 0905 under RNS No 5960I.
The amendment comprises the insertion of the words "a former wholly owned subsidiary of" before "its former investment adviser".  All other details remain unchanged.  The full amended text is shown below.

Metro Baltic Horizons plc
Litigation update
For immediate release
25 July 2012

The Board of Metro Baltic Horizons PLC ("MBH") wishes to announce that proceedings, which might have led to the forced sale of its property in St Petersburg to satisfy a disputed loan and related security, have been stayed by the Russian court pending the resolution of a related case which is being bought against a former wholly owned subsidiary of its former investment adviser by MBH in the Estonian courts. The Board of MBH is pleased with this positive development, but notes it is one step in a complex litigation process and does not represent a definitive resolution to the matters that are the subject of said litigation


EAGLEHEADS UP TO 30%

Eagleheads notes the acquisition of approximately 3.7 million shares for 10 cents per share by IIU Nominees Limited, Dolmen Securities Limited and a pension fund in which the chairman of MBH is interested. This brings the total announced holdings in the Company of board members and parties related to them to 29.96 per cent. The Company has not publicly disclosed the number of shares owned by other clients of Dolmen Securities Limited or clients of other companies connected to the chairman of MBH.

EAGLEHEADS WITHDRAWS ,AS THE TIGER ROARS.

Eagleheads Investments OÜ ("Eagleheads")

Response to announcements issued by Metro Baltic Horizons plc ("MBH" or the "Company") and withdrawal of Offer


Eagleheads notes the announcements issued by MBH on 20 July 2012 (the "20 July Announcement"), 23 July 2012 (the "23 July Announcement") and 26 July 0212.  Defined terms in this announcement are the same as those used in the offer document dated 19 July 2012 (the "Offer Document"). 

23 July Announcement

Eagleheads notes the acquisition of approximately 3.7 million shares for 10 cents per share by IIU Nominees Limited, Dolmen Securities Limited and a pension fund in which the chairman of MBH is interested. This brings the total announced holdings in the Company of board members and parties related to them to 29.96 per cent. The Company has not publicly disclosed the number of shares owned by other clients of Dolmen Securities Limited or clients of other companies connected to the chairman of MBH.

Upon admission to AIM in 2006, MBH was a company to which the City Code on Takeovers and Mergers of the United Kingdom (the "Code") applied. Due to several board changes resulting in all MBH directors being resident outside the UK, Isle of Man or the Channel Islands the Code did not apply to the Offer by Eagleheads. 

The purpose of the Code is to ensure that all shareholders in an offeree Company are treated fairly and are not denied an opportunity to decide on the merits of a takeover and that shareholders in the offeree company of the same class are afforded equivalent treatment.  On this basis, Eagleheads believes that it was in the best interests of the shareholders of MBH to act in relation to the Offer as if the Code applied to it (to the extent reasonably possible), and did so, whilst inviting the MBH Board to do the same.

Parties related to members of the MBH Board have purchased MBH Shares in circumstances where:

(a) the price paid was higher than the Offer Price (assuming that each of the Acquisitions was at the same purchase price of 10 cents a share); and

(b) the same exit opportunity was not provided to all MBH Shareholders.

Eagleheads believes that if the Code applied to the Offer, this behaviour may have been considered action which may result in the Offer being frustrated, and which may deny MBH Shareholders the opportunity to decide on the merits of the Offer. Such action is prohibited under Rule 21 of the Code.
Given the number of MBH Shares now controlled by the MBH Board and related parties and the consequent disadvantage to the success of the Offer that has resulted from the lack of protection provided by the Code, Eagleheads has decided to terminate and withdraw the Offer, meaning it is no longer capable of acceptance.

20 July Announcement

Eagleheads would also like to take the opportunity to address a comment made by MBH in the 20 July Announcement

Eagleheads did not make the Offer for the purpose of preventing MBH pursuing purported legal claims against MCM.

MCM has confirmed to Eagleheads that in its view the claims made by MBH against it are unfounded and, as far as Eagleheads is aware, no legal proceedings have been formally issued against MCM or its related parties by MBH in any jurisdiction.


HOPEFUL SIGNS IN PROPERTY

Highlights

·      Net asset value per share (NAV) after deferred tax liabilities decreased by 68% to €0.11 (30 June 2011: €0.34). The Company's valuations remain as those reflected in the Financial Statements to the year ended 31st December 2011.
·      Total gross property portfolio (including minority interests) valued at €8.97 million as at 30 June 2012 (30 June 2011: €18.1 million). The decrease in the gross property portfolio primarily reflects the revaluation of the St Petersburg property
·      At the period end, the Group held a total of €6.7 million of bank and other borrowings, €3.8 million of which was held at the SPV level and as such are non recourse to the Company
·      There are still some tentative signs of stabilisation in St Petersburg which may benefit remaining with this property but market recovery is unlikely to facilitate any meaningful recovery in the Pirita Tee property.
·      Strategic reviews of the St Petersburg property are underway, including longer term development options.
·      The Company intends to imminently commence legal proceedings against various parties including the former directors, professional advisers and investment management team in relation to a material proportion of the losses suffered by the Company.

THE FIGHTBACK BEGINS TO RECOUP VALUE  :

Issue of legal proceedings

For immediate release
8 October 2012

The board of Metro Baltic Horizons plc ("MBH" or the "Company") announces that the Company has issued legal  proceedings against its former directors and professional advisers, including MCM and its principal, Mart Habakuk, and TAS (formerly Metro Frontier Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of MCM) and its former principal, James Kenny. 

Together with two if its wholly owned subsidiaries, Pedragon Investments Limited and Goldbrick Investments Limited, the Company has issued legal proceedings in the High Court of Justice of the Isle of Man against Mr Robin James, Ms Kristel Meos, Mr Gunner Okk, Tolmain Advisory Services Limited (formerly Metro Frontier Limited), Metro Capital Management AS, Mr Mart Habakuk, Mr James Kenny, Mr Paul McGuinness, M G Capital Limited and McGuinness Investments OU.

The claims are for damages for negligence, breach of contract and/or breach of fiduciary duty (as applicable) arising out of the actions of the Defendants, in particular, that the Defendants (or certain of them together or separately) between 2007 and 2009 caused the Company's subsidiaries to enter into a series of detrimental property and related financial transactions, as a result of which the Group sustained substantial losses, currently estimated to be approximately €26.6m.

Ronan Reid, Chairman, MBH, commented: "The launch of the legal proceedings announced today underlines our determination to recover on behalf of our shareholders the losses that were caused to Metro Baltic Horizons by reason of the actions and inaction of its former directors and professional advisers."

Enquiries
MBH Holdings PLC
Ronan Reid                                                                                       Tel: +353 1 6333843

Fairfax I.S. PLC Nominated Adviser
James King, David Floyd                                                                   Tel: 020 7598 5368








MY CONCLUSION


What a fiasco.
From £1 to 3p Nice going Metro Capital Management  &  Eagleheads (new vehicle to scupper our value)

The list of bad boys and girls ;
Mr Robin James
Ms Kristel Meos
Mr Gunner Okk
Mr Mart Habakuk
Mr James Kenny
Mr Paul McGuinness
Margarita Novikova

Our good guys

Sir Philip Peter Scales
Ronan Reid 
Tim Crowley
Brendan Francis Murphy

The monetary value has been usurped to companies owned by the bad crew from the good crew.
It`s the old old old story.
Legally (reading between the lines)  ie the offer of £2.1 million is admission of guilt ,in stone and black and white.
Thus, 7p per share is a given.

Can we improve upon this.My feeling is yes.
I recommend holding up to 21p and beyond .

This share has all the hallmarks of my experience with MTT (300% gain +)
Why not substitute Eagleheads for Technoplus and the obscurity fades.



Editor (Gold or Silver).

Gla concerned

More Musings,
        Of course, this is a legal action, dodgy critters at the best of times.
The new board have shown themselves willing and up for the fight.
Both sides have made mistakes. The old board by trying the buyout and new board not strict enough company law wise (language and declarations, please next time Timothy).

The good news ,see you all very soon in the Isle of Man
Where our laws apply via the nine-island agreement. Yet, they have their own tax laws.
Funny old life is it not.

Gla concerned (especially the good guys ).




More

Pirita tee expected (Euro 26million)
Petrogradski  ( Euro 75 million)
Riga (Euro 105 million)

Total Development cost (euro 206 million)= £185 million
Less 50 % administration costing
Less depreciation land 50% =£47 million =Possibly 72p per share.
That is from  5p to 72p,or more if the court rules in our favour.
Of course, it may be more it may be less.

Good luck to Ronan and the team.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Goldbrick Investments Ltd  +++++

A derogatory term used to describe stocks that seem to have value but are, in fact, almost worthless. An unethical company may advertise its shares as being a good investment based on surface appearances by presenting only positive information about the stock. This term comes from the ironic tale that features a "city slicker" painting a brick gold and selling it to a "hayseed" as a gold ingot.



Metro Capital Management AS, the Investment Adviser, is an experienced and fast growing property asset manager and developer based in Estonia with offices in

Tallinn, Riga and St Petersburg. It was formed in 2002 following the merger of two Estonian property asset management companies established in 1997 and 2001respectively and has a professional staff of 19 currently managing a portfolio of 19 projects across the Baltics, ranging from mature cash flow yielding properties to early stage development projects in prime city locations. Gross assets under management are approximately Euro80m of which approximately Euro50mrepresents owner's equity. To date the compound annual internal rate of return in property developments managed by the Investment Adviser has been in excess of60% per annum.

The Investment Adviser currently manages property investments for approximately200 private and institutional investors including insurance companies, pension funds, investment funds and private banking clients of various international and local Baltic banks. This information is provided by RNS The company news service from the London Stock Exchange


- The Investment Manager will source and recommend suitable property development opportunities to the Company and expects to target development projects which can demonstrate an ability to generate a minimum internal rate of return to the

Company of 25%, after costs.

The Investment Adviser has already identified a number of potential opportunities for the Company which are in line with the Company's stated investment objectives.

__________________________________________________________________________________ Metro Baltic Horizon MET
Major Shareholders
Shareholder       Type     Amount % Holding
Pershing International Nominees Ltd        -           10,269,857        39.20
IIU Nominees Ltd           -           5,978,500          22.82
Chase Nominees Ltd      -           5,260,341          20.08
Pershing Nominees Ltd  -           4,153,642          15.85
Vidacos Nominees Ltd   -           1,523,522          5.81
Dolmen Securities Ltd    -           817,644 3.12
Director Holdings
Name    Type     Amount % Holding
Ronan Reid       -           601,285 2.29
Tim Crowley      -           440,537 1.68
Brendan Murphy            -           10,275  0.039


Preliminary investigation and relationship with Management Team

As referred to above, with assistance from external counsel, the Board has
conducted a preliminary internal investigation into the affairs of the Group
including the circumstances relating to the acquisitions made since Admission,
the counter-parties to such acquisitions and the related financing secured by
the Group and/or its advisers in completing such acquisitions.

Those preliminary investigations have revealed that the Group, via the actions
of the Investment Manager (Metro Frontier Limited ("Metro Frontier")), MCM and
the Company's financial controller (the "Management Team"), entered into a
number of transactions involving MCM and/or related parties to MCM and the
Board believes that the directors and the Management Team failed to manage the
Company in its best interests and/or with due care and skill.  In particular,
the Board believes, based upon the information it has reviewed, that:

(a)           inappropriate Powers of Attorney were issued to members of  the
Management Team and in situations where MCM was in a conflicted position;

(b)           the actions of the Company's financial controller were not
consistent with its being sufficiently independent from Metro Frontier and
MCM.  The former directors of the Company were unaware that that Paul
McGuinness (who provided the services of financial controller via a corporate
vehicle) was a director/employee of the same corporate finance house as James
Kenny, who was, until his resignation in November 2010, an executive director
of Metro Frontier and a member of the supervisory board of MCM;

(c)           the Group acquired Krasta, Metro Plaza and Pirita from MCM
and/or parties related to it pursuant to transactions which do not appear to
have been entered into on an arm's length basis;

(d)           procedures (in particular, those set out in the investment
management and advisory agreements) designed to ensure both adequate
disclosure to and protection of the Company  in the event of transactions
involving conflicts of interest on the part of Metro Frontier and MCM do not
appear to have been followed;

(e)           information provided by the Management Team to the Board
relating to the projects and in reports to the Company (including the extent
and nature of the Management Team's conflicts of interest) appears to have
been inaccurate and/or misleading;

(f)            the former directors of the Company appear to have failed to
follow appropriate corporate procedure and/or exercise material supervision of
the Management Team and/or sufficient independent judgment in relation to
transactions entered into on behalf of the Group and/or their implementation;

(g)           sufficient due diligence, including adequate valuations of some
or all of the properties does not appear to have been carried out before
acquisition;

(h)           the Management Team appears to have acted without due authority
in relation to at least one acquisition;

(i)            without adequate disclosure, MCM appears to have profited from
the sale of certain shares in OU Focus and/or otherwise acted to the detriment
of the Group;

(j)            the loan and mortgage arrangements between the Company's
subsidiaries and BAP do not appear to have been negotiated on an arm's length
basis and a substantial proportion of the Loan Notes were issued to parties
related to MCM; and

(k)  finally, despite the terms of the investment management agreement and
despite repeated requests from the Board,  Metro Frontier and MCM have failed
and/or refused to provide documentation and information relating to the
Group's affairs to the Company and/or its representatives.

In the circumstances, by letter dated 2 August 2011 the Company terminated its
agreement with Metro Frontier and hence its relationship with MCM.

 Given the reduced number of properties requiring active management the Board
is considering an investment management strategy of local advisers in Tallinn
and St Petersburg reporting directly to the Board.

The Board continues to review the strategic options available to the Company
and is considering legal actions against various parties (including the former
directors, professional advisers and Management Team) in relation to a
material proportion of the losses suffered by the Group.  The Board believes
that legal proceedings may be in the best interests of the Company.  The Board
notes that such proceedings are costly and there is no guarantee of success
and/or material recoveries but believes it appropriate to seek restitution for
losses incurred as a consequence of untoward actions taken against the Company
or acts of omission or negligence in regard of same and from all relevant
offending parties.

Further details in relation to the above will be announced in due course.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And more summarization,
Very keen on our chances of result (liability already admitted re-tender offer ).
The outcome another guess;
At 5p this is tremendous value.
I expect 20-30p settlement price ,as the defendants will settle before their names are sullied.
Gla concerned.

___________________________________________________







No comments:

Post a Comment